I thought the open night mic went fairly well. Everyone seemed to be enjoying themselves, and although not too many more people outside of our class attended, students in the UC were turning and listening to us, which I found to be cool. Sure, there were a few distractions, and the microphone can be a bit difficult to speak into if one is not comfortable with it, but overall, it was a great experience.
My performance went better than I imagined also--it wasn't perfect, but I thought I did well both with my speaking and playing, so I hope that people enjoyed it. Everyone's works were quite outstanding actually--I was surprised at the unbelievable talent of those in our class.
When we talked about the event on Monday night, people believed that it would be better to have it in a more theatre-like auditorium or classroom--an opinion that I disagreed (and still disagree) with. Even though only one person outside of Engl 223 presented, many people walked by and were introduced to the event. If it was at a more isolated location, people would have to know about it ahead of time, and locate the specified meeting area on campus. I will be honest--I wouldn't go through all that trouble, unless it was at a convenient time for me. However, if I just saw some people presenting in the UC while eating my lunch, I would be much more inclined to participate and listen.
That being said, I do believe that the time needs to be a bit earlier. For people who live farther away and who don't stay on campus very late, the event was quite inconvenient. If we just moved it up a couple hours (to maybe 4 or 5 o'clock), people would be much more inclined to stay and share the experience with us.
Overall, I would like to do the open mic night again, and although we could have had a better turn-out, I do not think that a different location would resolve that issue.